Koos Jansen
BullionStar Blogs
Koos Jansen
Posted on 21 Sep 2015 by

The London Bullion Market And International Gold Trade

Shortly after Ronan Manly released its epic post on 7 September 2015 about how much gold there is left in London, an email exchange started circulating among a small group of bloggers in a joint effort to figure out the apportionment between monetary and non-monetary gold in the capital of England. The group of bloggers consists of Ronan Manly, Nick Laird (Sharelynx), Bron Suchecki and me – of which Ronan and Nick have done all the hard work in collecting data.

This investigation is no different than others previously published on these pages, often aimed at the alleged whereabouts of physical gold around the world, in anticipation of an economic shock that will make this subject to be the primary one: how much physical gold is in whose possession at what location.

UK gold trade is a key component in this analysis, hence I like to publicly clarify a few assumptions on bullion flows in and out of the UK. Though, the information discussed can be applied to other gold hubs as well. This post will cover the present rules of English Overseas Trade Statistics (OTS) and elucidate how to interpret publicly available data.

The London Bullion Market

As early as 1671 Moses Mocatta moved from Amsterdam to London to establish the first member of the London gold market (now ScotiaMocatta). Two decades later in 1694 the Bank Of England (BOE) was founded, which soon had its vaults filled with bullion from the gold rush in Brazil. From that moment on London has been the epicenter of the global gold market. Many thousands of tonnes have crossed the UK’s borders over the centuries.

By approximation there are currently 6,200 tonnes of gold in the form of 400-ounce Good Delivery bars left in within the M25 London ring way. This consists of 5,100 tonnes stored at the BOE and 1,100 tonnes stored outside the BOE, predominantly in vaults from London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) members that offer custodial services for Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) such as GLD. The bullion at the BOE is for at least 3,500 tonnes monetary gold owned by foreign central banks, 310 tonnes is monetary gold owned by the BOE itself and the residual float is stored at the BOE by LBMA members.

Important to understand is that little of the 6,200 tonnes in London are owned by UK residents, most of it is monetary gold from foreign central banks stored at the BOE, the residual non-monetary LBMA float could be owned by gold market participants worldwide, just as the non-monetary ETF gold. Until Ronan publishes a post containing more exact data, the best estimates at this point are set out below:

  • 6,200 tonnes of physical gold in total in London.
  • 3,800 tonnes of monetary gold (MG) at the BOE.
  • 1,300 tonnes non-monetary gold (NMG) at the BOE (LBMA float)
  • 1,100 tonnes non-monetary gold (NMG) outside the BOE (ETF gold).

The Balance Of Payments And Overseas Trade Statistics 

To understand trade statistics, we must understand what trade is. Any country’s record of economic transactions between its residents and the rest of the world is called the Balance Of Payments (BOP). This includes all transactions from individuals, firms, and government bodies. Next to import and export of goods and services, BOP captures movement of financial capital and financial transfers. BOP can be subdivided in the goods and services account (also knows as the current account), the capital account and the financial account.

Whenever a resident in the UK would sell non-monetary gold to a resident in China, this would be recorded in the goods and services account of the UK and China. The UK’s goods and services account would register an export of goods to China and an import of funds from China; accordingly China’s goods and services account would register an import of goods from the UK and an export of funds to the UK. In contrast, if gold located in London that is not owned by a UK resident is physically moved to China this would not influence the UK’s goods and services account, but would indeed show up in the UK’s merchandise trade statistics. Therefor, BOP and merchandise trade statistics are separated records.

The guidelines for recording BOP transactions are drafted by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in its most recent version the Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual (BPM6). More important for our investigation, the physical movement of goods in and out of the UK are recorded in its merchandise trade statistics, in the UK called Overseas Trade Statistics (OTS), that comply with the guidelines of the International Merchandise Trade Statistics 2010 (IMTS) drafted by the United Nations. 

UK Gold Bullion Trade Data From HMRC And Eurostat

There are two sources to acquire OTS gold trade data from the UK. The first is Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), which is the administration of several regulatory regimes in the UK. The second is Eurostat, an organization that provides statistical information to the institutions of the European Union. Eurostat does not compute its own trade statistics, but relies on data from its EU members, for the UK that would HMRC.

HMRC gold

In January 2014 HMRC decided to publish non-monetary gold trade in their OTS, from which they had been exempt prior to 2014 as the global gold trading center – strangely, gold has a long history of being exempt from transparency. Let’s read the statement from January 2014 by HMRC on this remarkable decision (note, ONS is the UK’s administration to record BOP statistics):

Monetary Gold (MG) and Non-Monetary Gold (NMG) data has previously been excluded from all Overseas Trade Statistics (OTS) products. From January 2014 data, Non-Monetary Gold is included in these data series.

International convention is for NMG to be included in trade in goods statistics, and there is an EU legal requirement formalising this. The trade data we send to Eurostat,… includes NMG for the UK. We have been working with the Office for National Statistics (ONS) to introduce this change to UK-published data. We are doing this so the OTS is consistent with the data we send to Eurostat, and other international trade in goods standards. 

OTS releases from January 2014 data (published March 2014) onwards will include all trade declared in NMG. We will also publish comparison data tables to highlight the impact of the change. This was requested by users responding to a consultation exercise in March/April 2013.

When trade in gold is incorporated into the BOP trade statistics, this will be based on the balance of payments concept of ‘change of ownership’ rather than the OTS basis of ‘physical movement’. For this reason, there is likely to be a divergence in the trade statistics published within the UK by HMRC and ONS. ONS is currently working with the Bank of England and the London Bullion Market to obtain data on trade in gold based on ‘change of ownership’.

For us precious metals analysts the key takeaway is that HMRC makes a clear distinction between OTS and ONS/BOP statistics, or physical movement versus change in ownership, if you like. We can read, “When trade in gold is incorporated into the BOP trade statistics, this will be based on the balance of payments concept of ‘change of ownership’ rather than the OTS basis of ‘physical movement’, and, “OTS releases from January 2014 … onwards will include all trade declared in NMG”. Therefor, OTS data furnished by HMRC reflects flows of bullion in and out of the UK, whether the metal changes ownership or not.

Remember, the UK’s OTS complies with the International Merchandise Trade Statistics 2010 (IMTS). So, just to be sure if HMRC data is about physical movement, we should be able to read the rules mentioned above in the IMTS rulebook [brackets added by me]:

F.13. Non-monetary gold is recommended to be included in IMTS….

…the figures for imports and exports of “Total goods” in the BPM6 Goods and Services Account are expected, at least for some countries, to be significantly different from the figures for total imports and exports published in trade statistics [OTS], probably often reflecting the role of goods for processing without change of ownership, transactions between related parties and merchanting in countries.…

In addition, figures published for non-monetary gold in the BPM6 Goods and Services Account may be very different from those published in IMTS because BPM6 includes and excludes transactions of non-monetary gold based on the residence of the buyer and seller.

UN IMTS trade statistics

To be absolutely sure I’ve asked HMRC if indeed the data from their website (and Eurostat’s) on NMG trade represents physical gold flows in and out of the UK. HMRC replied:

Hi Koos,

HMRC reports the physical movement of gold into and out of the country e.g., gold bar located in a vault in London that is then physically exported to Switzerland. This is an export. Who is the actual owner of the gold is not a consideration for the trade in goods statistics (OTS).

ONS (BoP and National Accounts) – they report the change of ownership of gold. So, if a gold bar remains in a vault in London, but changes ownership from a UK resident to a foreign company. This would be classed as an export.  

Consequently, the figures produced by HMRC and ONS (BoP) do not and will not match.

More conformation. I’m positive that the UK gold trade numbers I’ve published on these pages since 2013 cover physical movements of bullion, which is how I presented them. OTS and ONS/BOP are two separated books.

In July 2015 the UK net exported another 30 tonnes of gold to China.

UK - CN Gold Trade 2012 - july 2015

Global Monetary Gold Trade And The PBOC

Now we know how to chase physical NMG around the world – as IMTS is worldwide guidance for customs departments – it’s worth investigating what there is to learn regarding monetary gold. In determining the definition of monetary gold and non-monetary gold we use the IMF’s BPM6. I should note IMTS and BPM6 have many references to each other, meaning these guidelines have been written in concert. In my opinion it’s safe to use the BPM6’ definitions on monetary gold, non-monetary gold, allocated gold accounts and unallocated gold accounts for all matters regarding (international) finance.

Below I’ve copied several quotes from the BPM6 report with respect to MG and NMG. Let’s read before we start connecting dots.

5.74 Monetary gold is gold to which the monetary authorities (or others who are subject to the effective control of the monetary authorities) have title and is held as reserve assets. Gold includes gold bullion and unallocated gold accounts with nonresidents that give title to claim the delivery of gold. Gold bullion takes the form of coins, ingots, or bars with a purity of at least 995 parts per 1,000, including such gold held in allocated gold accounts.

5.75 All monetary gold is included in reserve assets or is held by international financial organizations.… Gold bullion included in monetary gold is a financial asset for which there is no corresponding liability. Gold bullion not held as reserve assets is not a financial asset and is included in nonmonetary gold, within the goods and services account,…

5.77 … When held as reserve assets, unallocated gold accounts are classified as monetary gold.

6.78 … Gold bullion is usually traded on organized markets or through bilateral arrangements between central banks. To qualify as reserve assets, gold accounts must be readily available upon demand to the monetary authorities.

 

8.56 All transactions in gold bullion other than those included in monetary gold are recorded as nonmonetary gold in the goods and services account…. When a monetary authority acquires gold bullion from, or sells gold bullion to, an institutional unit other than a monetary authority or international financial organization, the gold is monetized or demonetized…. 

 

Monetization and demonetization of gold bullion

9.18 A special case of change in classification occurs for gold bullion. Gold bullion can be a financial asset (monetary gold) or a good (nonmonetary gold), depending on the holder and the motivation for holding. Monetization is the change in the classification of gold bullion from nonmonetary to monetary. Demonetization is change in the classification of gold bullion from monetary to nonmonetary. The treatment of particular transactions is as follows:

(c) When a monetary authority purchases gold bullion from a nonresident that is not a monetary authority or international financial organization, the transaction is recorded in nonmonetary gold in the goods and services account. Monetization of the gold bullion occurs immediately after the transaction and is shown in the other changes in assets and liabilities account of the monetary authority. 

10.50 Nonmonetary gold covers all gold other than monetary gold. Monetary gold, as defined in paragraphs 5.74–5.75, is owned by monetary authorities and held as a reserve asset. Nonmonetary gold can be in the form of bullion (i.e., gold bullion takes the form of coins, ingots, or bars with a purity of at least 995 parts per 1,000, including such gold held in allocated gold accounts), gold powder, and gold in other unwrought or semimanufactured forms. Jewelry, watches, and so forth that contain gold are included under general merchandise, not nonmonetary gold.

I believe the rules on montezing gold  to be the smoking gun for my thesis gold purchases by the Peoples Bank Of China (PBOC) around the globe have not been disclosed in global merchandise trade statistics. In previous posts I’ve analyzed by how much PBOC official gold reserves could have mushroomed since 2009 and how the Chinese central bank could have accumulated this gold. Whilst most gold analysts look at global trade statistics, to derive how much gold China imports annually, and then add Chinese domestic mining output as a yardstick for gold supply into the PBOC coffers, denying the structure of the Chinese gold market and the role the Shanghai International Gold Exchange, I’ve always stated the PBOC mainly buys gold abroad but these purchases are not reflected in global merchandise trade statistics – from Hong Kong, Singapore, the UK or any other potential supplier.

In the BPM6 quotes we can read that when a monetary authority (PBOC) purchases gold from a nonresident, the bullion is immediately monetized after the transaction. What happens next is that the (now) monetary gold can be exported without having to be declared as physical gold movement in merchandise trade statistics. For example, Hong Kong nearly net imported 600 tonnes of non-monetary gold in 2013. Is it possible some of this gold was monetized in Hong Kong by the PBOC and covertly imported into the mainland? Yes. I believe this is common practice.

As disclosed in my previous posts global bullion trade can be viewed in two main categories, non-monetary gold and monetary gold, each having its own Harmonised System (HS) codes:

Screen Shot 2015-09-18 at 10.28.06 pm

Non-monetary gold spans from HS code 7108.1100 until 7108.1300, monetary gold relates to HS code 7108.2000. The essential difference is that HS 7108.2000 (monetary gold) is always eclipsed, it’s blank. Because, customs departments around the word are exempt from disclosing monetary gold physical movements. From IMTS:

Since monetary gold is treated as a financial asset rather than a good, transactions pertaining to it should be excluded from international merchandise trade statistics.

HMRC wrote me:

Hi Koos, 

Under the International Merchandise Trade Statistics (IMTS) system we exclude all monetary gold from our Overseas Trade Statistics [OTS] publications.   

To my knowledge all countries using the IMTS system are exempt from disclosing monetary gold. Again, I think it’s very likely the PBOC, or one of its proxies, can buy gold in London, monetizes the bullion directly after the purchase and tells customs, not the bullion banks, “hey, this is monetary gold”, and take it home. UK Customs would be obliged to hide the shipment in HS 7108.2000.

In response to my thesis presented in prior posts Manager at the Perth Mint and colleague gold researcher Bron Suchecki wrote:

I agree with Koos that “the PBOC buys gold in utmost secret or it would influence the market and geo-politics” and that they may make overseas purchases, but I find it hard to believe that China can dictate to the customs department of another country that their gold exports should not be reported at all It would be impossible to hide such activity from Western bullion banks and secure carriers and the information would leak out eventually, even if it could get the movements not reported in customs figures.

Now we have read the official rules it appears that it’s not only possible China can dictate customs departments of other countries not to report gold transfers, it’s actually mandatory for customs departments to hide monetary gold movements.

Furthermore, prior to 2013, when HMRC did not publish any gold movements in and out of the UK, they were hiding all gold transactions under “HS 7108.2000 monetary gold”. HMRC wrote me:

For trade prior to 2014, the UK had a long standing exemption from the International reporting requirements for gold. This means that gold held as a ‘store of wealth’ had not been recorded as trade in goods. It had previously been classified as monetary gold, which is excluded from trade in goods as per international guidelines.

In order to bring the UK recording of non-monetary gold in line with international standards and legislation, the majority of the UK trade originally classified in the monetary gold commodity code (71082000) was reclassified as non-monetary gold. All that Monetary gold re-classified as Non-Monetary gold was put into the comcode 71081310. This was for the period 2005 to 2013 and allows better comparability with the statistics produced by other countries. 

Thousands and thousands of tonnes of gold movements had been hidden in HS code 7108.2000 (monetary gold) prior to 2014. Was this data ever leaked? Not really. The essence is that publicly available merchandise trade statistics are misleading for PBOC gold accumulation. Although, I don’t rule out non-monetary gold imported into China can someday end up at the PBOC’s balance sheet – or the PBOC is able to purchase domestic mine output – I just think it makes more sense the PBOC covertly buys gold abroad.

PS. Below you can see what I think is a significant screen shot from the BPM6 rulebook. The IMF has put Monetary gold right at the top of the global reserve assets list – above SDRs. The IMF writes, “…The gold bullion component of monetary gold is the only case of a financial asset with no counterpart liability”, and, “7.69 At the appropriate reference dates, reserve assets are valued in the main at current market prices. Monetary gold is valued at the prevailing market price, SDRs are valued at market rates calculated by the IMF, and deposits and loans are valued at nominal values.”

Screen Shot 2015-09-18 at 7.52.17 pm

Koos Jansen
E-mail Koos Jansen on:

  • Au_Nuts

    Just keep stacking.

    About to buy myself another kg of shiny Au.

  • Motley Fool

    Clearly well researched, and interesting information to boot. :)

  • Hogmeister

    Great find Koos! It’s the ultimate poker game.

  • rowingboat

    Conservatively I think it’s correct to assume that the 2,719mt increase in BOE holdings from 2006 to 2013 was non-monetary gold pulled into London by investors. That
    only 1,110mt has been unwound in the last two years (to Feb 2015) suggests there’s potentially a long way to go.
    Also, there may well have been non-monetary increases at the BOE in the first half of the bull market (2001-06). Central banks were net sellers during this period but investment demand was clearly on the rise.

  • philipat

    Excellent work Koos. You and Ronan are on fire recently!
    Just one question. On the other side of the MG transaction, is there no reciprocal obligation for the CB receiving the MG (In this case PBOC because a Sate owned “Private” Bank would presumably not qualify?) to REPORT the Monetary Gold as Monetary Gold or is there simply no International Ledger or convention covering the movement and reporting of MG by CB’s? That, of course, together with being able to report Leased-out Gold on the same line as physical Gold held, makes it impossible to really know what is going on. And I’m sure that the CB’s and BIS want it no other way!!

  • http://goldchat.blogspot.com/ Bron Suchecki

    “monetizes the bullion directly after the purchase and tells customs, not the bullion banks, “hey, this is monetary gold””
    The problem with this thesis is that the bullion banks, as shippers ex their vaults, and the shippers themselves, are aware of the classification the PBOC has to put on the paperwork for customs purposes. This actually supports my thesis that the best way for the PBOC to hide its gold accumulation activities is to let their state owned enterprises import the gold so that everyone thinks it is NMG and then “monetise” it when it is in the country.

    • philipat

      Not necessarily. Assuming there is some “Honour amongst thieves” can it not be assumed that The Bullion Banks, involved in many other types of obfuscation of their own, will keep the shipments confidential? HMRC certainly has no issues with such classification under International conventions and it is surely in the best interests of the BB’s to play along? The NMG route by SME’s gets total import figures on the record which can be reconciled against SGE offtake data?

      • http://goldchat.blogspot.com/ Bron Suchecki

        Its not about the bullion banks keeping the information confidential, its about the PBOC hiding from the bullion banks what it is doing so its isn’t front run.

        • philipat

          So WHO ships the Gold? According to Koos it is the BB’s. Or would PBOC take delivery in London then re-classify and arrange its own shipment? Someone would STILL know unless it is shipped via Diplomatic channels?

          • http://goldchat.blogspot.com/ Bron Suchecki

            It doesn’t matter who arranges the shipment or is deemed the exporter for customs purposes, the person who is holding the gold will see the airway bill or whatever paperwork is necessary to release the metal to the carrier. PBOC cannot hide from this, so the only way to hide its tracks is to have its SOE import the gold as if it was just NMG for commercial purposes.

          • philipat

            Thanks Bron and, yes agreed that unless the Gold was exported via Diplomatic channels (Difficult for Tommes of Gold although DPRK has been known to do it?) there would be an AWB which would be a source of potential leakage of information whoever shipped it. However, if , as you suggest,SOE’s were to import NMG then re-classify as MG in Beijing, that would mean that it WOULD be recorded in the HMRC data ex-UK? That kind of defeats the prupose IF the prupose is obfuscation of total and Official imports because NMG export data can be reconciled against SGE offtake with any unexplained balance presumably at least suspected of being Official Gold?

          • JanNieuwenhuijs

            I don’t know who ships the gold, it can be anybody, it can even be the PBOC gold army.

    • JanNieuwenhuijs

      Sure, possible.

      However, all the NMG that is imported into China is not LGD but 1Kg and is required to be sold through the SGE. Therefor the question is, does the PBOC buy gold through the SGE? (With all due implications.)

      Would the PBOC goes as far as to melt everything in 1Kg – LGD is cheaper – and import the gold through the SGE? In opinion “it’s not very likely”. I have wrote about all arguments in my previous post. https://www.bullionstar.com/blogs/koos-jansen/pboc-gold-purchases-separating-facts-from-speculation/

      • http://goldchat.blogspot.com/ Bron Suchecki

        How do you know all NMG coming into China is kilobars and there aren’t some LGD in those flows?

        • JanNieuwenhuijs

          Because all the gold that is imported is required to be sold first through the SGE. On the SGE we see nil LGD trading, just smaller denominations.

  • Guest

    Great article. I have a question regarding BOP and I am hoping that someone much more knowledgeable on this subject than I has the correct answer.
    How is the BOP of Country A affected by their citizens receiving dividend payments in their country from a company in Country B?

  • Ferdinand The Bull

    Awesome, Koos. My head is spinning and I will definitely have to read this again to get it to sink in, but you did a great job. Thank You

Copyright Information: BullionStar permits you to copy and publicize blog posts or quotes and charts from blog posts provided that a link to the blog post's URL or to https://www.bullionstar.com is included in your introduction of the blog post together with the name BullionStar. The link must be target="_blank" without rel="nofollow". All other rights are reserved. BullionStar reserves the right to withdraw the permission to copy content for any or all websites at any time.