Koos Jansen
BullionStar Blogs
Koos Jansen
Posted on 15 Oct 2017 by

The Gold-Backed-Oil-Yuan Futures Contract Myth

On September 1, 2017, the Nikkei Asian Review published an article titled, “China sees new world order with oil benchmark backed by gold”, written by Damon Evans. Just below the headline in the introduction it states, “China is expected shortly to launch a crude oil futures contract priced in yuan and convertible into gold in what analysts say could be a game-changer for the industry”. Not long after the Nikkei piece was released ‘the story’ was widely copied in sensational analyses throughout the gold space. However, ‘the story’, as presented by Nikkei, doesn’t make sense at all. Allow me to share my 2 cents in addition to what I shared previously on the Daily Coin.

All the rumours and analyses on gold, oil and yuan that are making rounds now in the blogosphere are based on the Nikkei article. But the Nikkei article itself contains zero official sources. Basically, the whole story has been invented by Damon Evans. So, let’s start addressing the claims made in the Nikkei piece.

It’s true that the Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) – not to be confused with the Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) – has recently set up a subsidiary called the Shanghai International Energy Exchange (INE), for foreign enterprises to trade a new oil futures contract denominated in yuan which is expected to be launched later this year (product symbol: SC). Specifications of the contract can be read here. In all official sources, though, there is no mention of gold. Officially this contract is not “convertible into gold”.

The only vague connection I could find is that the INE “will accept foreign exchange as … trading margin”. If this includes gold – which technically is not foreign exchange – we will see. In any case, even if gold will be used as trading margin that doesn’t mean the contract is “backed by gold”.

The Nikkei headline clearly reads “China sees new world order with oil benchmark backed by gold”. In this context, the word “backed” for most readers will refer to a fixed parity. In the past, for example, there was a fixed parity between gold and the US dollar; this meant the dollar was backed by gold through the US Treasury; dollars could be redeemed for gold at a fixed price and vice versa. In case of the Nikkei story it would imply a fixed parity between yuan, or oil (this is not clear), and gold. But how would China back anything with gold? Would China’s central bank (the PBOC) defend a fixed price of gold in yuan? And it would do so through an oil futures contract? Impossible.

Quickly ‘the story’ by Nikkei transformed through the blogosphere where analysts suggested the gold in SGE vaults would back the yuan. The problem with this theory is that gold in SGE vaults, (i) isn’t owned by the Chinese government, and (ii) isn’t allowed to be exported from the Chinese domestic market (not very convenient for foreign oil producers). Then analysts suggested the gold in vaults of the Shanghai International Gold Exchange (SGEI) would do the job. But SGEI gold, (i) isn’t owned by the Chinese government either, and (ii) can only have been sourced in the international gold market, payed for with US dollars. So much for the oil-gold trade circumventing US dollars as presented by Nikkei.

Now, let’s zoom in on the logic behind the phrase “crude oil futures contract priced in yuan and convertible into gold”. Futures contracts are an agreement between two traders about the future price of i.e. a commodity (usually denominated in a currency, in the case of the INE contract yuan). There can be no third asset, commodity or currency involved in a futures contract. It cannot be that upon physical delivery of SC – when oil is exchanged for yuan – one of the two traders will say, “you know what, I don’t want yuan (or oil), I want gold”. And, needless to say, the Chinese government will not mingle in the futures trade. The PBOC will not jump in when a SC short or long demands gold. Again, the new INE oil futures contract denominated in yuan will have nothing to do with gold.

What is possible is that when a SC short delivers oil in exchange for yuan, he is then free to buy gold with the proceeds. One can do so directly on the SGEI where three physical gold products denominated in yuan are listed.

Though, be reminded, currently no oil producer is prohibited from buying gold (or something else for that matter) when paid in US dollars. That’s actually the very function of money. Money is used, since ancient times, for what is called indirect exchange. Stuff is sold for money, and with that money all other stuff can be bought. Gold can be bought with the proceeds from oil sales since … forever. An oil futures contract will not suddenly change all that. In the Nikkei piece one analysts was quoted saying:

It’s a transfer of holding their assets in black liquid to yellow metal. It’s a strategic move swapping oil for gold, rather than for U.S. Treasuries, which can be printed out of thin air.

But oil producers are free to buy gold with their moneys (yuan or dollars) with or without the new futures contract. The INE contract will not remove an obligation i.e. for Kuwait to invest in U.S. Treasuries. So, what will change when this new oil-yuan futures contract is launched?

Also bear in mind that futures are hardly ever physically delivered. Futures are used for hedging and speculation. In general, commodities are physically traded in the spot market. Oil for dollars, chocolate for Swiss francs, Dutch cheese for euros, etcetera. Futures contracts are not necessarily needed to sell oil for yuan. Nikkei wrote:

China’s move will allow exporters such as Russia and Iran to circumvent U.S. sanctions by trading in yuan.

But effectively, Venezuela, Russia and Iran can sell their oil to China in exchange for yuan as of this very moment, before the oil-yuan futures contract is live. They also could have done so three years ago. So, in my very humble opinion the new INE contract will not be the instant game changer everybody is talking about.

Perhaps also noteworthy, one commentator on the Nikkei story wrote:

China just announced that any oil-exporter that accepts yuan for oil can convert the oil to gold on the Shanghai Gold Exchange and hedge the hard currency value of the gold on the Shanghai Futures Exchange.

My comments on this paragraph:

  1. As shown above China hasn’t announced anything but an oil-yuan futures contract. Gold has nothing to do with it.
  2. Yuan can technically be spend on gold at the SGE, but gold in the Chinese domestic market (SGE system) is not allowed to be exported. Gold from the SGEI is allowed to be exported but is bought in the international market via yuan with US dollars.
  3. Foreign enterprises, like oil producers, cannot hedge gold on the Shanghai Futures Exchange. The SHFE is not open for international customers. There’s only a spot deferred product listed on the SGE, which is comparable to a futures contract, through which foreign enterprises can hedge gold in yuan. But why would oil producers buy gold and subsequently hedge the metal in yuan. Their end position would be merely exposure to the price of yuan. Why then, not buy a yuan denominated bond with an interest rate? Or hold gold without the hedge?

Prior to publication of the Nikkei article in question I got an email from Evans. He asked me if “China will tie a gold guarantee to the new oil contract?”. I replied, “No. I would be surprised if they did that”. But my quote wasn’t selected for the final publication. The piece only quoted analysts singing the same song. In my view, that’s not what sound journalism is about. First of all Evans didn’t use any official sources, and second he picked analysts that confirmed his bias.

Aside from all the inaccuracies in the Nikkei article, what stands out for me is that indeed a large number of countries is willing to trade oil in yuan and the new INE futures contract is important for this development as it allows oil producers and users to hedge directly in renminbi. And so the INE contract will support oil for yuan trading. That’s what the article should have focussed on.

Although not much has happened yet*, it’s clear Asia wants to get rid of the petrodollar, and it will be interesting to see how this initiative develops.

*Still the majority of global trade is conducted in US dollars, and most foreign exchange reserves are in dollars too. The share of yuan payments, compared to all other currencies,  tracked by payment service provider SWIFT were under 2 % in June, down slightly from two years ago. (I have no data on CIPS payments.)

Swift share of global payments

And even China has added over $107 billion in U.S. Treasuries since November 2016.

US Treasuries held by foreign central banks

If you would like to learn more about the Chinese gold market and the SGE(I), please read my recently updated Chinese Gold Market Essentials Guide

Koos Jansen
E-mail Koos Jansen on:

  • Street

    As a trader, I’m watching this very closely. I doubt if very much, if they get very far with it due to sanctions against Iran, who would be a principal player. China, also has a terrible reputation in terms of their financial practices, especially with their exchanges, which reeks from corruption…..

    • fab

      As oppose to the US markets, which are the bastions of transparency and integrity

      • Street

        The US markets are not without their faults but they’re still a whole lot more secure with regulations and enforcement actions imposed by the SEC and the CFTC than elsewhere….

        • fab

          Everyone is entitled to their own opinion BUT not their own facts. “A whole lot more secure….” Is simply an opinion….as such its not worth having an argument over a vacuous opinion.

          • Street

            Now with that said, ‘go and put your money where your mouth is’….

  • quidproquocoins

    Mr. Jansen. Thank you for shedding the stark light of day on this issue. I will now watch the drivel shrivel. It will be fun to watch the roaches scurry for the dark. Excellent!

    • Joe Q

      How can anyone claim this is a myth??? It hasn’t happened yet. Unless Koos Jansen can foretell the future? The article said: “China is expected shortly to launch a crude oil futures contract priced
      in yuan and convertible into gold in what analysts say could be a
      game-changer for the industry.” This is not something new. In 2014 Forbes reported: “Under the sanctions, Turkey can’t pay for Iranian gas with dollars or euros. So it pays with gold.”” You can be sure Iran will continue to want to be paid in gold. Probably a few others as well. To claim something that hasn’t happened yet is a myth is ridiculous. To me the real problem is where will the gold come from? I doubt the West has much trade-able gold left for a meaningful market. As for disinterest in the US dollar, why would Saudi Arabia want to get Yuan for oil if they want to buy something priced in US dollars? So China decides to reduce purchases of Saudi Oil. So what? The Saudi’s will sell to someone else, and by the way, maybe the Saudi’s will avoid buying Made in China goods? The ONLY ones who want this arrangement is China, Russia and Iran and a few other anti-US cointries.

      • quidproquocoins

        As I attempt to understand why you commented to me, I read your rambling missive and I believe that your reading comprehension skills need improvement. I wrote 2 sentences and I did not use the word myth. I believe that the myth is that you read the entire Jansen article and understood anything. You might have heart and courage but the scare crow has you beat by a million miles.

        • Joe Q

          Actually I did not comment to you – not sure how you missed that???

          • quidproquocoins

            Maybe you posted it under my article, not the main article. Like I said, scare crow, keep wishing. I would not have gotten an alert if you posted under the main article.

          • Ron

            Dateline June 21, 2018: Since the “Gold-Backed-Oil-Yuan Futures Contract” is now a fact and therefore not a “myth” is there any official recantation from Koos or those who agreed with him in the com box below, such as quidproquocoins or others?

          • quidproquocoins

            Another paper scam for gold where no gold will ever leave China. Good luck getting your gold delivered in Geneva, London or NY.

          • Ron

            I appreciate skepticism when it is well founded on facts, but China is offering yuan redemption in gold along the silk road, as far west as Budapest. Any thoughts?

          • quidproquocoins

            The Chinese are smart and think long term, even generational. Westerners are the opposite. I understand their silk road concept. It lessens the reliance on the markets in the West. The US consumes 80% of our own goods and services. For China, it is about 50%. They must export to maintain their level of production. Imagine China not having a market for half their production. The present government could not survive. They are in a race to find new markets because, I believe they see a slump of Western demand and that slump could pull them down too if they do not diversify.

          • Ron

            Thanks for your reply, but the essence of the issue is still unanswered: yuan redemption in gold outside of China is now a reality. Thoughts? Is this whole article, and your prior comments on it, repudiated?

          • quidproquocoins

            How much gold has left China? It is my understanding that gold mined within China can not be exported. Eventually the gold outflow will be too much for the Chinese to tolerate. Today a reality yes, on paper. But paper is part of the Pirate Ponzi Pharaohs Parade of Paper. Now the Chinese can play the same paper circus that is played in the US by the Comex pirates that flood paper gold to influence the market for physical metal.

            My opinion is, I DO NOT trust the Chinese. I perceive them as having no moral compass. That is why I see this scheme as a sham that benefits China and hurts everyone else. You can believe the Chinese if you desire, good luck with that.

            There are benefits and liabilities to being the reserve currency. The American people have been punished by the liabilities and the government has benefited. That is why Mr. Trump is now President Trump.

          • quidproquocoins

            Can you tell me where yuan redemption in gold outside China is occurring, if indeed it is a reality? How much gold left China and where did it go?

  • PeaknikMicki

    Will be interesting to see whatoil producers will keep their proceeds in then. The internationalisation of yuan is hardly going to be supportive of a strong USD. I understan oil is also just one, albeit important one, but similar set up is being done for iron ore and to be follow by many more commodities. And China has never shown any interest in backing yuan with gold. Rather to have free price discovery based on physical metal rather than paper price. As the head of the Shanghai gold exchange said; when China get a voice in the international gold markets price will be revealed. And lastly Nikkei was hardly first out with writing about this. Oil for gold with free floating gold price was first predicted in writings by Another and FOA in the late 90s. GATA supported their predictions early with info on how China had started hoarding gold. The oil contract was circulated for review was it 2015 or early 2016 for market feedback and Luke Gromen wrote about this in forest for the trees. It was folled up by Grant Williams in an excellent and entertaining clip found on youtube calld Get it Got it Good.

    • fab

      Your comment is quite insightful. Mr Gromen I think has it right and FOA certainly has a deep understanding of the issue. If, and its a big IF, China is successful then the world is in for a major economic changes as the dollar will be challenged by GOLD, not Yuan, as the international currency.

      Key point: China no longer wants to be a hostage to the US$ and no longer wants the PBOC to be subsidiary of the FED.

      Sapienti sat est

  • http://the-one-law.international TheOneLaw

    The PRC gold yuan trick reminds of Churchill’s famous insult about
    how being inebriated is eventually recoverable.
    Corruption is apparently a terminal malady.

  • Not_Easily_Impressed

    A liar is a liar and who can trust a liar? Be careful who you trust.

  • Ron

    Dateline June 21, 2018: Since the “Gold-Backed-Oil-Yuan Futures Contract” is now a fact and therefore not a “myth” is there any official recantation from Koos or those who agreed with him in the com box below, such as “quidproquocoins” or others?

Copyright Information: BullionStar permits you to copy and publicize blog posts or quotes and charts from blog posts provided that a link to the blog post's URL or to https://www.bullionstar.com is included in your introduction of the blog post together with the name BullionStar. The link must be target="_blank" without rel="nofollow". All other rights are reserved. BullionStar reserves the right to withdraw the permission to copy content for any or all websites at any time.