Koos Jansen
BullionStar Blogs
Koos Jansen
Posted on 12 Apr 2014 by

Weekly SGE Withdrawals Dropping, YTD 585 MT

SGE withdrawals have been in a down trend for five weeks. In these weeks withdrawals have been lower than the year to date weekly average. This is not surprisingly after an unprecedented start of 2014. During four of the first seven weeks of this year SGE withdrawals, which equals Chinese demand, transcended global mining production.

SGE withdrawals are still 23 % up compared to the same period last year. This will most certainly change in the period after April 15, which was the date in 2013 the gold price tumbled more than $100 and Chinese demand for physical gold exploded. The result was that in week 16 (April 15 – 10, 2013) 65 metric tonnes were withdrawn from the SGE vaults and in week 17 (April 22 – 26, 2013) 117 metric tonnes were withdrawn. The following screen shot is from the SGE report of week 17 2013, the second number from the left (blue – 本周交割量) is weekly gold withdrawn from the vaults in Kg.

SGE withdrawals week 17 2013

How the SGE was promptly able to supply these amounts of gold is perhaps explained by the next chart.

Hong Kong - China gold trade monthly 1-2014

We can see import from Hong Kong, the main conduit for Chinese gold, reaching an all-time high in March 2013, before demand exploded. Which I find suspicious. Needless to say the mainland must also have imported gold through other ports in this period.

On April 11, 2014 Bloomberg reported the SGE will be launching a gold leasing platform. According to one of my sources in the mainland this service will not lead to fractional reserve banking or double counting as happens when central banks lease gold. He wrote me:

The lease on the SGE doesn’t seem to allow fractional banking according to the lease agreement rules.


“1.4. 本协议所称黄金租借,是指在有授信额度前提下,在约定的期限内,借出方将自有黄金租借给借入方使用,”

Translated: “Article 1.4. The gold lease in this agreement, means under the credit limit, within agreed tenor, the lender lends HIS OWN gold to the borrower for use.”

And the SGE gold account I have is directly with the SGE not with the bank that I use as a broker. That’s why the SGE account number never changes.

Overview Shanghai Gold Exchange data 2014 week 14

– 26 metric tonnes withdrawn in week 14 (31-03-2014/04-04-2014)

– w/w – 28 %

– 585 metric tonnes withdrawn year to date

My research indicates that SGE withdrawals equal Chinese wholesale gold demand. For more information read this.

Shanghai Gold Exchange withdrawals 2014 week 14

This is a screen shot from the weekly Chinese SGE trade report; the second number from the left (blue – 本周交割量) is weekly gold withdrawn from the vaults in Kg, the second number from the right (green – 累计交割量) is the total YTD.

SGE withdrawals

This chart shows SGE gold premiums based on data from the SGE weekly reports (it’s the difference between the SGE gold price in yuan and the international gold price in yuan). It seems as if the change of the premiums on the SGE are the inverse of the direction of the price of gold.

Shanghai Gold Exchange premiums

Below is a screen shot of the premium section of the SGE weekly report; the first column is the date, the third is the international gold price in yuan, the fourth is the SGE price in yuan, and the last is the difference.

SGE premiums

Koos Jansen
E-mail Koos Jansen on:

  • Mars Ipan
  • Mars Ipan


    “Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time.” Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 F 2nd 906 at 910.

    “It is axiomatic that the prosecution must always prove territorial
    jurisdiction over a crime in order to sustain a conviction therefor.”
    U.S. v. Benson, 495 F.2d, at 481 (5th Cir., 1974).

    “The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been
    challenged, it must be proven.” Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502

    “Where there is absence of proof of jurisdiction, all administrative
    and judicial proceedings are a nullity, and confer no right, offer no
    protection, and afford no justification, and may be rejected upon direct
    collateral attack.” Thompson v Tolmie, 2 Pet. 157, 7 L. Ed. 381; and
    Griffith v. Frazier, 8 Cr. 9, 3 L. Ed. 471.

    “The United States is entirely a creature of the Federal
    Constitution, its power and authority has no other source and it can
    only act in accordance with all the limitations imposed by the
    Constitution.” Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 1 L. Ed. 2nd. 1148 (1957).

    “The rights and liberties of the citizens of the United States are
    not protected by custom and tradition alone, they are preserved from the
    encroachments of government by express/enumerated provisions of the
    Federal Constitution.” Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 1 L. Ed. 2nd. 1148

    “The prohibitions of the Federal Constitution are designed to apply
    to all branches of the national government and cannot be nullified by
    the executive or by the executive and the senate combined.” Reid v.
    Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 1 L. Ed. 2nd. 1148 (1957).

    “Where rights as secured by the Constitution are involved, there can
    be no rule making or legislation which will abrogate them.” Miranda v.
    Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966).

    “Congress may not, by any definition it may adopt, conclude the matter, since

    “Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an
    arresting officer’s life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306.

    United states of America Constitution Article 1 section 9 No Bill of
    Attainder or EX POST FACTO Law shall be passed. 2nd Amendment; shall NOT
    be infringed!

    They took an oath to uphold and preserve the constitution.. Perjury of oath is a FELONY! 18 U.S. Code § 1001

    Brookfield Construction Co. v. Stewart, 284 F.Supp 94: “An officer
    who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the

    in Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), to wit:

    Congress … cannot by legislation alter the Constitution, from which
    alone it derives its power to legislate, and within whose limitations
    alone that power can be lawfully exercised.

    U.S. v Mersky (1960) 361 U.S. 431 a statute that regulates without
    constitutional authority is a nullity even though it be published in the
    books, recognized by the police and lowers courts, and even though it
    be unchallenged for decades.

    The Legislature, either by amending or otherwise, may not nullify a
    constitutional provision Rost v. Municipal Court of Southern Judicial
    District of San Mateo (1960)

    “Every person (this includes EVERY government official) who under
    color of law, deprives any citizen of rights, privileges, or immunities
    secured by the United States Constitution is subject to civil and/or
    criminal penalties pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 241
    and 242. Penalties include up to $10,000 fine and/or 10 years to life
    imprisonment, or both, if death results.”

  • Mars Ipan






    —- http://dirtyunclesam.com/crs-report-for-congress-top-of-page-5-crs-2-top-paragraph-executive-order-6-and-7-signed-by-the-secretary-and-not-by-the-president-ordering-the-14th-amendment-ratified-and-published/

    Page 5 of this report which is crs-2, top paragraph, makes clear that Executive Order 6 (Presidential proclamation #11) ordered the 14th Amendment ratified. Exhibit (E) http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=015/llsl015.db&recNum=739

    Executive order #7 (Presidential Proclamation #13) Ordered the 14th Amendment lawful and published. Exhibit (F) http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=015/llsl015.db&recNum=741

    Both E.O. 6 and 7 never had the signature of the President. Only the Secretary of State. So, these two fake executive orders are booked and paged as Presidential proclamations. As the CRS report makes clear. Proclamation #12 admitting the states under a newly established legislative bodies replaced the Constitutionally elected one. The states were blackmailed into ratifying the said 14th Amendment or be denied representation in Congress and remain under marshal law. Exhibit (G) http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=015/llsl015.db&recNum=741

    Keep in mind the seated president at that time Andrew Johnson was against the 14th Amendment claiming it created a Unconstitutional de facto government as he pointed out in his veto address, Exhibit (H) http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llhj&fileName=064/llhj064.db&recNum=562&itemLink=r%3Fammem%2Fhlaw%3A%40field%28DOCID+%40lit%28hj0641%29%29%3A

    De facto government Blacks Law dictionary 5th Ed. Page 375. “one that displays itself by a force against the will of the rightful legal government and is successful at least temporarily in overturning the institutions of the rightful legal government and setting up it’s own in lieu thereof. Wortham v. Walker 133 Tex. 255, 128 S.W.2d 1138,1145.

    THE 14TH AMENDMENT WAS NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY ADOPTED 1) The joint resolution proposing said 14th Amendment was not submitted to or adopted by a Constitutional Congress. Article 1 section 3 and Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution 2) The joint resolution was not submitted to the President for his approval. Article 1 section 7. 3) The proposed 14th Amendment was rejected by more than one-fourth of all the States then in the union, and it was never ratified by three-fourths of all the States in the Union. Article 5.

    THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONGRESS The U.S. Constitution provides: Article 1 Section 3. “The Senate shall be composed of two Senators from each state”.

    Article 5 provides: “No State without it’s consent, shall be deprived of it’s equal suffrage in the Senate”.

    The fact that 23 Senators from northern and southern states had been unlawfully excluded from the U.S. Senate, in order to secure a two-thirds vote for adoption the 14th Amendment. THE LOUISIANA LEGISLATURE URGING CONGRESS TO DECLARE THE 14th AMENDMENT ILLEGAL. On June 13,1967, A WELL ANNOTATED LAW DRIVEN BRIEF ON THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE 14th AMENDMENT and how its an act of treason against our Constitution and how it over threw our Constitution, prepared by Judge Leander H. Perez, of Louisiana, was memorialized on the House floor. Memorization page number 15641- 15646 of this LAW DRIVEN Congressional Record, thus, showing how several Unconstitutional acts were done in-order to claim the said 2/3 votes needed for ratification, including 23 senators from northern and southern states were also unlawfully excluded from the US Senate in order to secure this 2/3 vote. All this also included replacing 10 lawful state governments for rejecting the 14th Amendment as Unconstitutional, for the loss of state rights, and how the federal courts will not hear an argument on the invalidity of the 14th




    The 14th Amendment was executed a by FAKE EXECUTIVE ORDER signed by the secretary NOT the president.

  • Mars Ipan

    The Real Reason the U.S. Dollar Has Value

    Chris Mayer

    I was at a conference when I took out a dollar bill and waved it in
    front of the audience. I asked, “Why does this piece of paper have
    value?” It’s interesting the range of answers I got.

    One person said “gold,” which has nothing to do with it. There was a
    time when you could demand a fixed weight in gold in exchange for a
    dollar, but those days are gone. Another said, “You can buy things with
    it” — an answer that only begs the question why that is so. “Faith,”
    said yet a third. Not quite.

    The answer is one that (some) economists have known about for a long
    time. I’ll tell you about it below along with three other
    counterintuitive and seemingly bizarre conclusions about the twisted
    world of modern money. I don’t think you would draw it up this way if
    you had the chance — but it’s the way the system works.

    Tax liabilities give otherwise worthless paper value. The U.S. dollar
    has value because the government levies $3 trillion in tax liabilities
    annually and accepts only U.S. dollars in payment — which only it
    issues. And there is the credible threat of penalties if you don’t
    settle up with dollars. In so doing, the government turns all of us into
    dollar chasers. It’s how a state, any state, can turn worthless pieces
    of paper into valued currency.

    “The modern state can make anything it chooses generally acceptable
    as money,” economist Abba Lerner wrote in 1947. “If the state is willing
    to accept the proposed money in the payment of taxes and other
    obligations to itself, the trick is done.” Brilliantly devious, isn’t

    A dollar is, essentially, a tax credit. Economists call this the
    tax-driven view of money, and it is at least as old as Adam Smith. It is
    also one of the core principles of Modern Monetary Theory, or MMT.
    (This is a macroeconomic school of thought that has taken the deep dive
    into the plumbing of how modern money works.)

    The principles of MMT have a certain forceful logic. And they can lead to some shocking and uncomfortable conclusions…

    One example is that government deficits increase financial savings.
    It sounds outrageous. How can government deficits increase savings?
    Well, how else is the nongovernment sector supposed to get dollars? The
    only way is for the government to spend more than it collects — thereby
    leaving money in the economy.

    Or think of it this way, as economist Warren Mosler puts it: “When
    the government spends, only two things can happen to that money… the
    money can be used to pay taxes, or it isn’t used to pay taxes. In which
    case, somebody out there still has it.” So deficit spending equals
    financial savings at the macro level.

    Government debt, then, is a form of savings for the private sector.
    Everywhere there is a Treasury security there is someone who owns it.
    For that holder, it is a part of his financial wealth, or savings.

    But aren’t government deficits and debt too large? They can be too
    large, which then causes the dollar to lose value. However, in a fiat
    currency system, it is natural for the government to be in deficit,
    because the private sector usually wants to save something.

    In fact, there is a good argument that any attempt to balance the
    budget is futile. It will simply lead people to cut spending in an
    effort to get back to a desired savings level. This also has the effect
    of contracting the economy and driving tax receipts lower, thereby
    putting the government back into deficit.

    “Government debt… is a form of savings for the private sector.”

    The trouble with budget surpluses is they take money out of the
    economy. That puts pressure on private-sector balance sheets. It may not
    be so surprising to learn, then, that economic depressions have
    followed every major surplus in U.S. history.

    Another conclusion is that government doesn’t need taxes and bond
    sales to finance spending. Most people think that the government
    collects taxes and sells bonds to finance its spending. But remember,
    the government issues dollars. It can’t run out. This sounds scary, but
    it’s the naked truth of a fiat currency system. The U.S. government
    faces zero solvency risk. It can always meet all of its bills.

    Of course, there are consequences when government spends. If it
    spends “too much” relative to what dollars can buy and the desire to
    save, then the dollar can lose value. (Which is what’s happened over the
    last century. I see no reason why this trend will end.) But the
    government clearly doesn’t need to borrow or collect something it issues
    in order to spend. That’s the point.

    Further, think about it from the beginning: What must a government do
    before it collects its own money in taxes? It has to spend the money
    first. That’s how people get the dollars to meet the tax. So logically,
    spending precedes tax collection.

  • Erasmus

    Donno ‘PEOPLE ISSUES’ – Cross-cultural communication

    WARNING – This story evidences a degree of inappropriateness,
    excessive vernacular, wanton animal cruelty and poor taste, is
    irreverent and ribald. Indiscriminate readership is not advised.

    Purveyors of the art of instruction will often point to the challenge
    of communication – What a person thinks they say, what they actually
    say, and what the listener understands them to say.

    This communication challenge is even more difficult when dealing with different cultures.

    My recent experiences in remote jungle living on a tropical pacific
    island could fill a book, and after 5 years, it was apparent that my
    communication skills were still in their ‘ab initio’ infancy.

    My good wife was even more challenged as the local indigenous males,
    who were of such a size as to be able to ‘leap tall buildings in a
    single bound’, (if not pick them up and carry them away when one was not
    looking), tended to break down into guffaws of merriment when
    instructed by her on a particular task.

    Indeed, if I was away for a day, I would often arrive back home to
    find that they had been fired by her for failure to do a task in a
    particular way (if not due to their riotous joy at her presumption to
    instruct them.)

    Direct supervision was usually required, for if, for example, you
    gave an instruction to weed a particular area, you would come back to a
    barren landscape, which had been ‘cleaned’ of all living plant life,
    including your prized vegetables and herbs. This was often accomplished
    by them expeditiously setting the area on fire or using a cane knife.

    As I favoured the technique of empowering others to use their own
    initiative, I invariably experienced open mouthed incredulity at the
    final result, in conjunction with a berating or ‘bollocking’ from my
    wife for being irresponsible in failing to adequately frame the job and
    executing poor supervision.

    In fact, many words and phrases soon invoked extreme caution in me.
    One such phrase was ‘too easy’, which I initially took to mean that the
    task I had assigned to them was considered to be of child like
    simplicity, and I need not worry any more, and could go and commence an
    early imbibing of some kava (aka grog), and leave them to successfully
    complete the task.

    ‘Too easy’ soon came to mean that direct supervision was required,
    and if I blinked there was a distinct possibility that the job would go
    ‘tits up’, but as I had an almost masochistic tendency to see what would
    happen if I didn’t, I now have enough examples to fill a disaster’s
    book entitled ‘Too Easy.’

    Although my wife had unfortunately determined that my ‘laissez-faire’
    approach resulted in disastrous outcomes, I adopted micromanagement ‘vi
    coactus’ – as is evident in any large project, you cannot be everywhere
    and do everything yourself. I share with you just one of my book of
    disaster stories.

    After 9 months of raising chickens in preparation for the ‘zombie
    apocalypse’, it was decided by a committee of one (my wife), that our
    tropical paradise was now a hell on earth, with 24 hours a day of
    incessant screeching/clucking/howling, indiscriminate and voluminous

    It was decided to send them on a 3 month holiday, so that this
    ravenous phalanx could deforest another mountain range jungle, allowing
    our small patch to regrow.

    I provided some card board boxes, with appropriate breathing
    apertures, and my trusty friend who was desirous of 200 eggs/week, then
    uttered the now fear inducing words ‘too easy’ when asked about the
    stress of transportation for these shrieking wenches and how he would
    achieve this stress free transportation safely and efficaciously.

    I was absent for a few minutes to secure some soothing Beethoven
    tunes to ease their stress of travel, to find that the chickens had
    their ankles bound by duck tape, and were unceremoniously deposited in 2
    large flour sacks.

    I was extremely dubious about this, but was assured in an earthy
    knowing tone as they departed that this was the preferred mode of
    transport for these erstwhile noisy destroyers of serenity.

    At any rate, nagging doubts persisted, and I called later that day to
    determine on whether their 1 km relocation of our three toed terrorists
    was without incident, and whether they were happily engaged in ‘the art
    of warfare’ at his abode.

    Without embarrassment, remorse, empathy or sympathy, I was duly
    informed that some 75% had expired mysteriously in the sacks, and had
    just stopped breathing due to the trauma at losing their home (and not
    due to being asphyxiated).

    Anyhow, they lamented their future egg loss by promptly plucking and
    cooking the chickens in a tasty lovo, and I am sure that they asked for
    forgiveness for their lack of care as they licked their fingers.

    We were devastated, and so were my wife’s Facebook friends, as we had
    raised these chickens from 1 day old yellow fur balls, celebrating
    their daily progress and adventures.

    The 6 remaining chickens got to produce some eggs for at least a few
    days until they too mysteriously succumbed to various ailments
    associated with new settlement anxiety.

    I recount this story as an example of how different cultural
    frameworks, communication techniques, and gender inequality all play a
    role in misunderstanding (notwithstanding the lethargy induced by almost
    100% humidity and heat dulled concentration).

    Suggestions to overcome these challenges are welcome, however, if I
    was fortunate to live another 50 years in that location, my ability to
    effectively communicate with the locals might be raised to ‘novice’
    level. I would hasten to add that were I to establish a course for
    highly effective communication across vast cultural gaps, a final exam
    assessing students’ competency would be in observing these students
    overseeing a project to completion, however, a strictly no refunds
    policy would be stipulated!

    “it is not the voice that commands the story; it is the ear.” – Italo Calvino

  • Day Starr
  • Anon the Bron
  • I Run Bartertown

    The Bundy Affair Is the Tip of the Iceberg To What’s Coming

    April 13, 2014 – Agenda 21, Featured, Main – Tagged: agenda 21, BLM, cliven bundy, dave hodges, harry reid, solar energy zones, the common sense show – no comments

    Dave Hodges

    April 13, 2014

    The Common Sense Show

    The BLM has tucked their tail between their legs and run for cover.
    Sheriff Mack, the other sheriffs, various state legislators, Oathkeepers
    and average people who make up our militias personify the words
    courage, integrity and honor. May God bless and protect every brave soul
    who went to the aid of a beleaguered family. Our American heroes
    prevented another Ruby Ridge and Americans should forever be grateful to
    all who went to the aid of Cliven Bundy. America still has many great
    people who are worthy of the descriptive term, hero. Cliven Bundy has
    also demonstrated to the world what is means to be an American and stand
    up to tyranny and win. Like so many overreaching federal agencies, when
    confronted, they are cowards and they tuck their collective tails
    between their legs and run for cover.

    They Will Be Back

    has been widely reported, the Chinese have paid $4.5 billion dollars to
    build a solar plant on the Bundy property. The Clark County (NV)
    Commissioners are on the hook for that money. This is why one of their
    threatened to send anyone traveling to the aid of Bundy home in a body
    bag. There is absolutely no way that the Bundy Affair is over.

    Sometimes, our personal life experiences prepare us in ways which
    helps us to understand an event in a manner that the general public will
    not see because the public does not have the experience. The events at
    Cliven Bundy’s property is something that I have lived through and I can
    see clearly what is happening and what is coming. This is much more
    than a land grab and a case of simple cronyism resulting in a land grab
    of the Bundy property. This kind of event has been happening and is
    happening as I write these words. Soon this kind of event will be

    Nearly all people reporting on this issue see it as a one-time
    resource grab involving Senator Harry Reid, his sons, the Clark County
    Commissioners and the Chinese government. The people reporting this are
    correct. However, this goes much, much further. Unfortunately, I have
    the experience to recognize this for what this is. Also, I have come
    across a Bureau of Land Management Policy Manual which spells out what is happening to Bundy and why.

    I feel compelled to tell you at this point that my life was
    endangered when I exposed these connections in my neighborhood. While on
    the air with Annie DeRiso and Jim Marrs, the building I was in was shot
    at eight times. This event was recorded on the archives of the Republic
    Broadcasting Network. Additionally, a pair of men repeatedly tried to
    run me off the road one Saturday night approximately 6 miles from my
    home. The event was recorded from my 911 call which lasted 10 minutes,
    but the transcripts and recordings all disappeared. In both cases, law
    enforcement covered the crimes committed against me despite the fact
    that there were multiple witnesses to each event. Each event involved my
    revelations to the public about John McCain cronyism with the foreign
    owners of the Canamex Highway system and their plans to steal all
    property within my rural community. This is precisely why Cliven Bundy’s
    life is in danger. He is experiencing what I have lived through. You
    can bet your bottom dollar that the Bundy affair is just getting started
    and the following paragraphs will demonstrate why this is true.

    The Arizona Coalition to Protect Personal Property Rights (ACPPR) vs. Sen. McCain’s Canamex Highway Forces

    I live in rural Arizona approximately 20 miles north of metropolitan
    Phoenix and 20 miles south of Wickenburg, AZ. Over 10 years ago, 300
    homeowners in our immediate area faced an undeclared de facto eminent
    domain action against us without so much as one dime being offered in
    compensation. My community responded to challenge by forming the ACPPR
    and I was asked to be the spokesperson and I later became the director.

    My sleepy, rural area had grand designs placed upon us by the forces
    behind the North American Union and in particular the Canamex Highway
    which was to connect Mexico with Canada. The highway was to run 8 miles
    to the west of my home which should not have been a threat to the
    globalist forces behind this transportation corridor. However, my area
    was slated as a Canamex international multimodal hub. This meant that 6
    miles to the east of home a railway hub, a trucking depository and a
    small auxiliary airport left over from WW II was to be converted to a
    small airport to service the goods and services coming into this hub. My
    community was caught between the highway and the multimodal hub. To
    make things worse, my community also sits upon the largest underground
    water aquifer in Arizona known as the Hassayampa. The globalists needed
    our water to service the hub and they could not allow 300 homes to drain
    the reservoir. Therefore, the McCain forces convinced local politicians
    to legislate against us and strip us of all property rights in attempt
    to force us out over a period of time without paying us for the loss of
    our homes.

    Over an eight year period, I was able to convince several of our
    Maricopa County Commissioners and a good number of State Legislators as
    to what was truly happening us. We were able to build a coalition and
    turn back the McCain group who was working on behalf of the foreign
    ownership of the Canamex. In short, they wanted our water and our land
    to build a monolithic infrastructure hub. My subsequent media
    appearances designed to expose this tyranny is what led me to do the
    broadcasting and writing that I do today.


    The powers that be wanted my community’s water, the globalists want
    Bundy’s land to build a monolithic energy hub which is powered by solar
    energy controlled by the Chinese and they want to put it on Bundy’s
    property and I have the document that proves these claims.

    Solar Energy Zones

    I have discovered the existence of a BLM document which
    introduces America to a new Agenda 21 land designation and it called a
    “Solar Energy Zone”. The smoking gun BLM document is entitled:

    Regional Mitigation Strategy for the

    Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone

    Technical Note 444

    Produced by:

    Bureau of Land Management

    March 2014


    The BLM produced document carefully spells out all the Agenda 21
    precautions to protect the environment and indigenous wildlife in these
    newly created Solar Energy Zones. The document specifically mentions the
    tortoise and it need to be protected, which is at issue in the Bundy
    case. Every form of species is protected within these Solar Energy Zones
    except for humans and nothing is mentioned about how land will be
    acquired through the eminent domain process.

    The document makes it clear that land can be acquired to protect
    local species which could be threatened. This is how the federal
    government is getting around declaring eminent domain and paying people
    fair market value for their land, prior to stealing it. This is exactly
    what my community went through in the last decade in fighting against
    the Canamex Highway.

    Reid, Clark County Commissioners, the Chinese and Cronyism

    “The Bureau of Land Management, whose director was Sen. Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) former senior adviser, has
    purged documents from its web site stating that the agency wants Nevada
    rancher Cliven Bundy’s cattle off of the land his family has worked for
    over 140 years in order to make way for solar panel power stations”.

    Most people view the recent events directed at Bundy to be a case of
    political and economic cronyism. There is certainly that element.
    However, this is much bigger than the corrupt Harry Reid and his sons.
    The next few sections will begin to connect the relevant dots and a
    clearer picture will begin to emerge.


    Noted researcher, Vicky Davis, sent me the location of the proposed
    solar farm where Bundy’s property is located and its neighbor is Nellis
    Air Force Base. It’s right there and Harry Reid is aiding and abetting
    the Red Chinese to locate a facility close the AFB. The same overlap is
    mentioned in the previously identified BLM Solar Energy Zones document.

    When I was serving as the Spokesperson and later as the Director of
    the ACPPR, I noticed that nearly all Canamex Highways were located
    adjacent to a military base. I also noticed that the existence of an
    inland port was located in the same area. And we know that the Chinese
    are heavily involved in the control of inland ports.

    Connecting the Dots

    is time to connect the dots on one leg of this land grab in Nevada. The
    I-15 Canamex Highway runs adjacent to the planned theft of the Bundy
    property. In this location, a new Agenda 21 land designation is emerging
    and it is called a “Solar Energy Zone”. Solar Energy Zones will connect
    the variables of the Canamex, the evisceration of private property
    rights, land use delineated in the Agenda 21 Wildlands, the control of
    all transportation corridors within the United States and the ultimate
    betrayal, the Chinese control of all military bases in the United States.

    How do I know this? First, I have lived through the same resource
    theft, property rights grab with the Canamex. Additionally, in Arizona,
    we are also establishing a solar farm system that has all the hallmark
    traits of what is going on at the Bundy property. The Arizona state
    government is cooperating with various federal agencies to build a massive solar farm 70
    miles southeast of Phoenix. The Arizona solar project is located
    adjacent to Luke AFB flight operations and it is near another energy
    resource, the Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant. As an aside, I was
    contacted by a Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant employee this week. FEMA
    has been on sight in a surprise inspection and my source has expressed
    apprehension and surprise at this development. Does anyone else smell a
    false flag coming? Also, as time goes on, I am certain this will connect
    the Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant to the solar farm.

    The Bundy area contains the exact same set of variables as what I am
    seeing here in Arizona in that we see the Canamex Highway nearby, a land
    grab, proximity to a military base and proximity to another large
    energy resource, the nearby Hoover Dam. I suspect that I
    am now going to hear from many people across the country who are going
    to now connect these dots in their home state and see this for what it

    If the Chinese gain control of all new energy (i.e. solar power), can
    imagine what your energy costs will be? Our problems with this plot
    extend far beyond energy costs.

    Coincidence or Conspiracy?

    Chinese Solar on Bundy Ranch Arizona Solar Farm

    Chinese money backing projectChinese money involved in
    projectCreation of Agenda 21 “Solar Energy Zone”Creation of Agenda 21
    “Solar Energy Zone”Located near a Canamex Highway (I-15)Located near a
    Canamex Highway (1-10)Located near a major energy source (Hoover
    Dam)Located near a major energy source (Palo Verde Nuclear Plant)Located
    near a major military base (Nellis AFB)Located near a major military
    base ancillary facilities (Luke AFB)

    If I were a betting man, I would say that the Chinese will soon have
    control of all interstate highways that are connected to the Canamex
    Highway Corridor system. This would be a precursor event to an invasion
    in which an invading force would secure all transportation routes.

    is becoming clear that these Solar Energy Zones will be merged with
    other major energy sources (i.e. hydroelectric and nuclear power). This
    will potentially give the Chinese complete control over our energy and
    they can charge whatever they want.

    Further, placing Chinese interests near a major military installation
    can be construed as another precursor to invasion. The bases could
    easily be neutralized before they could stop the advance of an invading
    blue-helmet military force.


    My fellow Americans, we are seeing this government hand off all
    future energy to the Chinese. They are stealing American land to do so,
    through agencies such as the EPA and BLM. The Chinese will soon be
    occupying the bases adjacent to these Solar Energy Zones. This should
    scare the hell out of all us. We are about to be occupied by Communist
    Chinese forces and our federal government agencies are a party to this
    take over. I will be writing on the military aspect of this threat in a
    future article.

Copyright Information: BullionStar permits you to copy and publicize blog posts or quotes and charts from blog posts provided that a link to the blog post's URL or to https://www.bullionstar.com is included in your introduction of the blog post together with the name BullionStar. The link must be target="_blank" without rel="nofollow". All other rights are reserved. BullionStar reserves the right to withdraw the permission to copy content for any or all websites at any time.